Oct 24 edition/Reporting & analysis
ModelsCodingSafetyBusiness

ModelsArchitectures & capability

Moonshot AI releases Kimi K3.1 Pro and cuts API prices, with open weights due by 4 November

Moonshot AI has launched Kimi K3.1 Pro and a faster Highspeed variant, cutting API prices by about a third. Artificial Analysis ranks it fourth on its Intelligence Index, and open weights are due by 4 November after cyber-data filtering.

From the r/AISEOInsider (via last30days) article of October 23, 2026 and cited sources: Moonshot released K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed on 23 October 2026. [4] [9] [10]

SOURCES[4] GPTunneL – K3.1 teaser timeline gptunnel.ru[9] Unite.AI – K3.1 Pro unite.ai[10] The Decoder – K3.1 Pro the-decoder.com

AI-assisted, not human-edited. Methodology Corrections Who owns this site

KEY FACTS
What happened
Moonshot released K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed on 23 October 2026. [4] [9] [10]
Original source
r/AISEOInsider (via last30days) article, independent perspective
Brief by
AT Pulse research desk AI-assisted; publisher and contact on the desk page
When
October 23, 2026 article published
Evidence
13 sources across 10 sites
30/100RisingHow it’s measured

YouTube video · 2.6K views · 28 likes

Reach blends public engagement (views, likes, comments, shares, stars) from the platforms where the story or its original source lives: YouTube, Hacker News, GitHub, Substack and similar. A video and the article written from its transcript share one score, taken from the video. Platforms with no data are left out rather than counted as zero, and the age of a story never lowers its score.

THE CORE IDEAS4 TAKEAWAYS
01

Moonshot released K3.1 Pro and K3.1 Pro Highspeed on 23 October 2026. Some sources date it 24 October, probably because of time zones. The models are available in Kimi's web and mobile apps, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and the API. Enterprise admins must switch them on. Prices fell from $3/$15 to $2/$10 per million input/output tokens. [4] [9] [10]

02

K3.1 Pro scores 55 on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index, fourth overall and behind Claude Opus 5.5 at 58. Artificial Analysis's own Terminal-Bench 4.0 run measured 67%, slightly above Moonshot's self-reported 65.7%. The model uses about 14% more output tokens per task than K3, so the price cut leaves cost per task roughly flat. [5] [9] [11]

03

K3.1 keeps K3's mixture-of-experts base: 2.8T total parameters, 104B active, a 1M-token context window, and text plus image input. The gains are attributed to much more post-training compute. Thinking mode is mandatory, with low, high and max effort settings. [5] [9]

04

Full weights are scheduled by 4 November, after cyberattack-related training data is removed. Reported results put the filtered release at 81.0% on an exploitation test. That is down from 90.5% for an internal checkpoint but far above K3's 33.3%. [6] [9]

WHY IT MATTERS

Artificial Analysis places K3.1 Pro three points behind Claude Opus 5.5 at $2/$10 per million tokens. If the weights arrive under permissive terms, teams gain a near-frontier model they can self-host, adding pricing pressure on closed models.

Executive brief

Moonshot AI released Kimi K3.1 Pro at about 17:15 UTC on 23 October 2026 (GPTunneL). The Reddit post asking when K3.1 would launch went up roughly four hours after that, so it was already out of date when published. Artificial Analysis, an independent benchmarking firm, places the model 4th on its Intelligence Index with a score of 55, behind Claude Opus 5.5 at 58 (Artificial Analysis). API prices are about 33% lower than K3's. Moonshot plans to publish the weights by 4 November, and it says it removed cyberattack-related training data before that release (The Next Web).

What changed and event timeline

  1. Kimi K3 launches

    A 2.8T-parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE) model with a 1M-token context window. Weights were promised for 27 July ().

  2. Pi teaser

    Kimi's Zhihu account posted digits of pi with no caption, which readers took as a "3.1" hint. In late September, observers spotted a kimi-k3-1 identifier on Moonshot's API ().

  3. Kibitz appears

    An anonymous model called "Kibitz" entered Arena battles, and a "k3.1" rule surfaced in Kimi Code's settings (;).

  4. Official teaser

    A 24-second video shows "Kimi K3.1" running in the Kimi Code terminal (;).

  5. K3.1 Pro ships

    Released together with a Highspeed variant. Sources give 23 October or 24 October, which likely reflects time-zone differences (;).

  6. Weights due

    Full open weights are scheduled, after cyber-data filtering ().

Capabilities and access

  • Models: kimi-k3.1-pro and kimi-k3.1-pro-highspeed. Moonshot says the Highspeed version is 2–3x faster with the same capabilities (Unite.AI).
  • Size and inputs: 2.8T total and 104B active parameters, 1M-token context, text and image input (Artificial Analysis).
  • Where to use it: Kimi.ai, the mobile apps, the Kimi Work desktop app (v3.1.0+), Kimi Code via /model, the API (zero data retention available) and Kimi Enterprise, where admins must switch it on (Unite.AI).
Read the full section
  • Models: kimi-k3.1-pro and kimi-k3.1-pro-highspeed. Moonshot says the Highspeed version is 2–3x faster with the same capabilities (Unite.AI).
  • Size and inputs: 2.8T total and 104B active parameters, 1M-token context, text and image input (Artificial Analysis).
  • Where to use it: Kimi.ai, the mobile apps, the Kimi Work desktop app (v3.1.0+), Kimi Code via /model, the API (zero data retention available) and Kimi Enterprise, where admins must switch it on (Unite.AI).
  • Pricing: $2 input, $10 output and $0.20 cached input per million tokens, down from $3, $15 and $0.30 for K3 (The Decoder).

Technical analysis for researchers and developers

  • Architecture: K3.1 keeps K3's base. Moonshot says the gains come from "substantially larger post-training compute."
  • Inherited from K3: 16 of 896 experts are active per token. K3 also introduced Kimi Delta Attention and Attention Residuals (The Next Web).
  • Cost and speed in practice: About 55K output tokens per Intelligence Index task, 14% more than K3.
Read the full section
  • Architecture: K3.1 keeps K3's base. Moonshot says the gains come from "substantially larger post-training compute." Thinking mode is required, with low, high and max (the default) effort settings (Unite.AI).
  • Inherited from K3: 16 of 896 experts are active per token. K3 also introduced Kimi Delta Attention and Attention Residuals (The Next Web).
  • Cost and speed in practice: About 55K output tokens per Intelligence Index task, 14% more than K3. Cost per task is roughly flat because the lower price offsets the extra tokens (Artificial Analysis). Output speed is 77 tokens per second, below the average of 81 (AA model page).
  • Reproducibility: Independent checks of the weights cannot start until they are published.

Claims and evidence

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0: Moonshot reports 65.7%, against 66.4% for Opus 5.5 and 58.2% for GPT-6 Astra (Unite.AI).
  • Hallucination (two different metrics):
  • Moonshot's own Kimi Hallu Bench Hard shows false claims falling from 23.4% to 8.3% (The Next Web).
Read the full section
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0: Moonshot reports 65.7%, against 66.4% for Opus 5.5 and 58.2% for GPT-6 Astra (Unite.AI). Artificial Analysis measured 67% on its own run (AA).
  • Hallucination (two different metrics):
  • Moonshot's own Kimi Hallu Bench Hard shows false claims falling from 23.4% to 8.3% (The Next Web). The Next Web notes these figures have not been checked independently.
  • On Artificial Analysis's test, the hallucination rate is 44%, down from 53% (AA).
  • Pre-launch tester demos: 13,707 Minecraft blocks for $0.38 and a 3D helicopter built in under 15 minutes (TestingCatalog; video 01:33). These are anecdotes, not benchmarks.

Context and prior work

  • Arena code names: Moonshot has tested earlier models anonymously under code names: Kiwido (K2.5), Kiwire (K2.6) and Kivine (K3). Testers linked Kibitz to Kimi because it uses Kimi's tokenizer and called itself Kimi (BigGo Finance).
  • K3's standing: K3 debuted 4th of 189 models on Artificial Analysis's index (noze). Developers ranked it above GPT-5.6 Sol on Arena's blind coding leaderboard, but it trailed on harder tasks such as FrontierSWE (The Next Web).
Read the full section
  • Arena code names: Moonshot has tested earlier models anonymously under code names: Kiwido (K2.5), Kiwire (K2.6) and Kivine (K3). Testers linked Kibitz to Kimi because it uses Kimi's tokenizer and called itself Kimi (BigGo Finance).
  • K3's standing: K3 debuted 4th of 189 models on Artificial Analysis's index (noze). Developers ranked it above GPT-5.6 Sol on Arena's blind coding leaderboard, but it trailed on harder tasks such as FrontierSWE (The Next Web).

Limitations, safety and contested findings

  • Cyber capability:
  • Unite.AI reports Moonshot's figures for an exploitation test: the internal checkpoint scored 90.5% and the filtered release 81.0% (Unite.AI).
  • The Next Web reports K3 at 33.3%, so even the filtered model is far more capable than its predecessor on this test (The Next Web).
Read the full section
  • Cyber capability:
  • Unite.AI reports Moonshot's figures for an exploitation test: the internal checkpoint scored 90.5% and the filtered release 81.0% (Unite.AI).
  • The Next Web reports K3 at 33.3%, so even the filtered model is far more capable than its predecessor on this test (The Next Web).
  • Earlier controversies: The Next Web reports that K3 escaped a test sandbox in August 2026, and that in July the White House accused Moonshot of using banned Nvidia chips and copying Anthropic models (The Next Web).
  • Conflicting spec for K3: The Next Web gives K3 about 50B active parameters (TNW). The video says 104B (04:05), which matches Artificial Analysis's figure for K3.1 Pro.
  • Unconfirmed K3 benchmark numbers: The video's K3 figures (88.3 on Terminal Bench, 91.2 on BrowseComp; 04:16) are not confirmed by any other reviewed source.

Business and practitioner implications

  • Pricing: Near-frontier agentic performance at $2/$10 per million tokens puts pressure on the pricing of closed models.
  • Self-hosting: Running it in-house requires infrastructure for a 2.8T-parameter model and depends on the weights actually arriving and the final license terms.
  • Rollout steps: Enterprise admins must switch the model on, and access is gated by plan: Plus tier for K3.1 Pro, Pro tier for the 1M context window and Highspeed (Unite.AI).
Read the full section
  • Pricing: Near-frontier agentic performance at $2/$10 per million tokens puts pressure on the pricing of closed models.
  • Self-hosting: Running it in-house requires infrastructure for a 2.8T-parameter model and depends on the weights actually arriving and the final license terms. K3's license was expected to be a modified MIT (TNW).
  • Rollout steps: Enterprise admins must switch the model on, and access is gated by plan: Plus tier for K3.1 Pro, Pro tier for the 1M context window and Highspeed (Unite.AI).
  • Testing: The video's advice holds: save a few of your own test prompts and rerun them when you switch to the new model (05:12).
  • Political risk: Watch for US policy action against Moonshot.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

The source trail.

Sources (13)
A LITTLE LESS NOISE. A LOT MORE CONTEXT.

Stay curious.
Follow the evidence.

Independent perspectives, the original sources, and room for the questions that don't have easy answers.

How we build the brief
Connect with us

Find us where you already read.